One commenter asserted that many State labor rules already offer that an worker subject matter to investigatory interviews is allowed to have a union agent existing for a meeting that might lead to discipline. If a State law demands a recipient to permit a union agent to be existing during a disciplinary proceeding, the receiver may possibly not be in violation of these remaining regulations by permitting a get together to a Title IX grievance process from being accompanied by the two an advisor of alternative and a union representative. Furthermore, when § 106.71 necessitates a receiver to keep private the identity of get-togethers to a Title IX grievance process, which limits the discretion of a receiver to allow events to have people other than the party's advisor of choice existing during the grievance system, that provision boundaries the confidentiality obligation by expressly stating that the receiver will have to retain occasion identities confidential except as necessary by regulation.
