That is hardly the notion of continuous ethical progress over the course of human historical past that the atheists wish to attraction to. Some ladies, similar to Marguerite Yourcenar and Mary Renault, wrote or translated works of fiction that targeted on homosexual males, like a number of the writings of Carson McCullers. A more outdated version of Mill's Harm Principle is closely based on utilitarianism (i.e., maximizing internet happiness in society); hedonism, or pleasure looking for, is the basis for a lot of liberal, feminist, and homosexual ethics. One of the strongest criticism of it is that it might permit gangrape, on the basis that a gaggle of rapists would acquire extra complete happiness than the victim gained any unhappiness such that the net happiness on the planet has increased. One may disagree with and say that: "Harms have been all the time recognized and easily distinguished but highly effective, evil, self-serving folks prevented moral sentiments from changing in order to handle those harms." However, there's completely no proof by any means that certain harms have been always identified throughout human historical past.
